enron

History has a way of repeating itself. Think about Theranos, Enron, and WeWork, all companies that built facades of strength and innovation but collapsed when their patterns of misconduct were exposed. The catalyst for change in those cases often came from investigative journalists who forced regulators to act. But in today’s world, where platforms amplify voices, suppression tactics have become the new way to prevent those dominoes from tipping.

And yet, transparency always wins. Today marks Day 27 since my ARDC filing against the counsel for nuEra cannabis (Latimer LeVay Fyock). According to the ARDC’s own guidelines, preliminary denials are typically issued within 14 days. When that timeline passes without a denial, it means the complaint has merit and is moving forward. That alone says a lot. It tells us that this isn’t just noise this is a legitimate issue being taken seriously by those tasked with regulating ethics.

And funny enough, isn’t it amazing how quickly things go from journalists and regulators turning a blind eye to suddenly, “We’d love to talk”? It’s like clockwork. Patterns don’t lie, and apparently, neither does a clear timeline of regulatory filings on cover-up actions like I posted Friday.

Here’s the truth: personal liability is no longer a distant possibility for some. It’s here. When counsel actively participates in alleged unethical actions or knowingly enables bad-faith moves, they’re not just representing a client they’re implicating themselves. And when one regulatory body starts an investigation, others inevitably follow. Why? Because in a highly regulated, multi-jurisdictional industry, everything eventually comes to light. Deleted emails, hidden messages they’re never really gone.

But here’s the kicker: not a single filing of unethical behavior or illegal tactics I made was about my original case. Nope. Every single one was about the cover-up and the tactics used to make it all go away. Think about that. If you’re going to such extreme lengths to silence voices and squash a case, what does that say about the original case? That it was true. You just confirmed it for everyone. But hey, what do I know? Patterns don’t lie, right? No one would ever risk violating multiple regulatory agencies’ rules to cover up a lie. Never.

Months ago, I said personal liability would start spreading. That the actions taken by leadership, legal teams, investors, and others would come back to haunt them. And now, it’s happening. One investigation starting means the door is wide open for others. When regulators see merit, they move. And when they move, so does everyone else.

I’ll keep you updated as transparency continues to shine a light on what’s happening here. But one thing is clear: this is no longer about what’s being said. It’s about what’s already been done and how those actions will define the future for everyone involved in any way shape or form.